NBF attorney Michael A Guadagno, acting as local counsel, obtained a favorable decision in Hai v. STL International, Inc. from Division II of the Court of Appeals. Plaintiff had sought damages resulting from an alleged design defect in the defendant’s product. Defendant moved for summary judgment arguing for the application of Texas law, which barred plaintiff’s claims under the statute of limitations. Pierce County Superior Court had granted the defendant’s motion and dismissed all claims with prejudice. On appeal, Division II unanimously affirmed dismissal.
News & Events
Our Impact
April 15th, 2014
April 1st, 2014
NBF attorney Jeremy Jones provided the Marine Insurance Association of Seattle with a presentation on the application of the Shipowner’s Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30501 et seq.
March 26th, 2014
NBF attorney Michael A. Guadagno was admitted to the Idaho State Bar.
February 27th, 2014
NBF attorney Michael A. Guadagno facilitated an 8th grade mock trial at the U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington before Judge John C. Coughenour.
December 30th, 2013
Nicoll Black & Feig announces the addition of our newest paralegal, Leigh Ann Martin.
September 19th, 2013
Nicoll Black & Feig announces that Dee Dee Bonifant has joined our team.
July 31st, 2013
NBF attorney Michael A. Guadagno provided Grange Insurance with a presentation on the implications of Cedell v. Farmers Insurance Company of Washington, 176 Wn.2d 686, 295 P.3d 239 (2013).
June 14th, 2013
NBF attorney Michael A. Guadagno provided the Puget Sound Adjusters Association with a presentation on the implications of Cedell v. Farmers Insurance Company of Washington, 176 Wn.2d 686, 295 P.3d 239 (2013).
June 6th, 2013
NBF attorney Michael A. Guadagno is awarded the Professional Excellence Award from the Seattle Select Attorneys Association.
May 24th, 2013
NBF attorneys Curt H. Feig and Michael A. Guadagno won summary judgment dismissal of plaintiff’s claim for breach of contract. Messrs. Feig and Guadagno argued that the policyholder’s claim arising from an elevator loss was excluded under the policy’s corrosion exclusion. The court agreed and granted defendant’s motion.